This post has been  a long time coming, but that’s probably a good thing.  Way back in the summer, we had an interesting debate at work which spilled out onto Twitter with some great results.  It was called “The Comms Question” and was looking at the issues related to communicating via social media.

Here’s some examples of the questions we were asking:
  • Should social media accounts be personal, professional or corporate?  Should they be a mixture of all three?  If they are a mix, can this distort the message?
  • If people use personal accounts, is there a danger of contacts leaving with the staff or people misrepresenting the company?
  • Who, in a public sector organisation, engages with twitter on an official basis?  The comms team?  The managers?  The frontline workers?
  • For Twitter or facebook engagement to truly take place the conversation is important.  Can this conversation take place with a comms team, rather than a subject specialist?
No doubt these questions will continue to promote debate, and I don’t intend to answer them, if that is indeed possible, in this blog post.  Instead, I want to focus on the last two of those questions, in relation to local government.
Traditionally, the comms team has been about communicating to the people via the media.  Most comms teams are made up of former journalists, PR professionals and assistants keen to learn that apparently glamourous world of PR.
However, social media presents an interesting question.  For the first time, PR teams are having to deal directly with the most volatile and disruptive audience of all – the electorate.  This is a different ball game.  The electorate cannot get “off the record” briefings, will not also respond with the professionalism you’d except (and sometimes even get) from the media.  The electorate do not always want to know about the latest initiative and do want an answer, not a statement.
During the snowy weather, I contacted a local council via twitter with a question around gritting.  They didn’t respond to the tweets (presumably they were using twitter as a top down tool rather than the conversational tool that it should be) so I contacted an individual at the council directly.  They were far more helpful but were only able to send me a statement from highways.  Having worked in Comms, I understand that this is the best they could do and I’m not blaming the comms team for that…but I’m also aware that the average citizen is going to respond differently, feeling ignored and blanked out.  This, I realised, means social media isn’t just about maintaining a conversation…its about a relationship.
Council community workers (and by this I include arts workers, youth workers and anyone in the business of engaging with communities) will know that there’s often a conflict of interest in their work.  On the one hand, they are representing the council, something that gives them a bit of credibility and gives them the security and terms and conditions that working for a council gives you (and despite the current climate, council work is still more secure than charity work, in my opinion).  On the other hand, there are many in the community, particularly those who are disengaged, who are suspicious of the council, who prefer not to know where you’re from.  One of the skills in council community engagement is ensuring people take up council services, without the corporate feel.  There’s a way of talking to people, interacting with people, being patient but firm with people that’s really a skill thats honed by community workers over a large period of time.  Almost without fail, community workers are passionate about subjects such as equality, satisfying the often peculiar demands of random strangers and generally helping the world be a better place.  So, why aren’t community workers in the comms team dealing with this?
The problem comes two fold.  Firstly, community workers are often still very much about face-to-face….and long may that continue.  Community workers often see social media as something they use at home, outside their work remit.  This is a shame, as, in my experience, one of their greatest talents is translating everyday people skills to professional practice.    Secondly, community workers’ passions for society are not always conducive with the council’s vision.  Community workers are more often than not about the people rather than the politics.
What we need is a dialogue, a conversation between the front line officers and the comms team.  We needs comms managers that understand the important skills community workers have in terms of communications.  We need community workers who understand the importance that message and corporate reputation play in running a local authority.  Then we can start a more meaningful conversation and maybe even get to know our audience.
Social media is a great way to interact and councils are now starting to embrace the tool.  Some have even got as far as the conversation.  Now it’s time to look at the language.
Share

This entry was posted on Friday, December 17th, 2010 at 22:12 and is filed under Uncategorized, engagement, social networking, strategy, web2.0. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “The Comm/unity Question”

  1. Vicky Sargent on December 18th, 2010 at 88:52

    Great post on a really important question many are wrestling with. Interestingly though, when you ask the question ‘who, in a public sector organisation, engages with twitter on an official basis?’ you don’t include the web team in your possible answers. At Socitm, we’ve been monitoring councils’ online responses to weather emergencies and other things like elections where residents want news and information, fast. Councils are starting to use Twitter and Facebook to keep information and, yes, in some cases dialogue, going with residents in just the ways you recommend. A lot of this is being driven by web teams, who ensure the information is up on the website and then use social media to get the information and links out to their followers, and their followers’ followers and so on virally. Some service areas are also getting involved too, with their own FB pages and Twitter accounts. Evidence from this activity is in the massive spike in council website activity that can be seen on days when there has been severe disruption because of the weather. You can read more about this in our publication ‘Twitter Gritters’ http://www.socitm.net/downloads/download/268/twitter_gritters_council_use_of_digital_channels_in_local_emergencies which will be updated with survey data on councils’ responses to the current snow crisis that will appear in the 2011 Better connected survey of all council websites that comes out on March 1.

  2. admin on December 18th, 2010 at 11:03

    Thanks for that Vicky, I’ll take a look at that report. I didnt know about it, so I can claim ignorance in ters of stealing the title for my last post.

    Around a dozen of us have, through the govcamp process, come up with some excellent ideas and lessons around social media use in existing and potential emergency situations….it would be great if we could work with SOCITM to cascade that out? What do you think? My email is Kevin@campbellwright.co.uk

Leave a Reply