<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Socially resticted by way of remuneration?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://campbellwright.co.uk/wesenwille/2010/01/socially-resticted-by-way-of-remuneration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://campbellwright.co.uk/wesenwille/2010/01/socially-resticted-by-way-of-remuneration/</link>
	<description>Community through Technology, Media &#38; Communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 13:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirl Downen</title>
		<link>http://campbellwright.co.uk/wesenwille/2010/01/socially-resticted-by-way-of-remuneration/comment-page-1/#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirl Downen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campbellwright.co.uk/wesenwille/?p=162#comment-1136</guid>
		<description>Its really nice,  i like it. I used google translator </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its really nice,  i like it. I used google translator</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Eastwood</title>
		<link>http://campbellwright.co.uk/wesenwille/2010/01/socially-resticted-by-way-of-remuneration/comment-page-1/#comment-1025</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Eastwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campbellwright.co.uk/wesenwille/?p=162#comment-1025</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m employed in a politically restricted post and at times find that quite difficult. As someone with strong views and opinions, I do feel that my wings have been clipped. If I mentioned what political direction those views went in, technically I could be held to have breached the restrictions!

Under the Widdicombe rules senior officers are barred from standing for election, political campaigning, writing or speaking in a manner which could affect the standing of a political party or holding office within a party.

Understanding of what counts for &quot;political campaigning, writing or speaking in a manner which could affect the standing of a political party&quot; has been varied. In general we&#039;re advised to air on the side of caution and withdraw from any such activity. Perfectly harmless, low key campaigning for human rights, for example, could be interpreted as conferring support for one party position&#039;s on that issue over another. 

In practice these rules stop you being able to participate in the democratic process at any level. We are effectively silenced.

Despite my background, my view on taking up my first such post in 2002 was very much c&#039;est la vie. An annoyance and irritation but the price you have to pay if you wish to progress a career in local government. I&#039;ve been OK with that generally. I understand how I need to maintain neutrality and be apolitical in the performance of my professional duties. 

I do however still think this is a great shame. We live in an age where politics is increasingly marginalised and where we are actively seeking new ways of engagement yet we exclude a large number of people from participation who would have a strong contribution to make. 

As for the use of social media my own experience has been that it can at times be difficult. I&#039;ve had some great exchanges on Twitter during #bbcqt and with @cllrtim and others, but on more than one occasion I&#039;ve had to delete a part written tweet and sit on my hands to avoid &#039;crossing the line&#039;. 

As more people begin to use social media I suspect we will see this challenged. There will inevitably continue to be headlines about officials being dismissed because of &#039;that evil Face Book and Twitter&#039; - the Daily Mail &amp; Express seem to love this stuff - but as the social tech fulcrum moves and we develop a maturity towards and understanding of these issues, the mist of uncertainty will lift and common sense will prevail. 

We may even see the rules on standing for office scrapped and then who knows what the future will hold for many of us!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m employed in a politically restricted post and at times find that quite difficult. As someone with strong views and opinions, I do feel that my wings have been clipped. If I mentioned what political direction those views went in, technically I could be held to have breached the restrictions!</p>
<p>Under the Widdicombe rules senior officers are barred from standing for election, political campaigning, writing or speaking in a manner which could affect the standing of a political party or holding office within a party.</p>
<p>Understanding of what counts for &#8220;political campaigning, writing or speaking in a manner which could affect the standing of a political party&#8221; has been varied. In general we&#8217;re advised to air on the side of caution and withdraw from any such activity. Perfectly harmless, low key campaigning for human rights, for example, could be interpreted as conferring support for one party position&#8217;s on that issue over another. </p>
<p>In practice these rules stop you being able to participate in the democratic process at any level. We are effectively silenced.</p>
<p>Despite my background, my view on taking up my first such post in 2002 was very much c&#8217;est la vie. An annoyance and irritation but the price you have to pay if you wish to progress a career in local government. I&#8217;ve been OK with that generally. I understand how I need to maintain neutrality and be apolitical in the performance of my professional duties. </p>
<p>I do however still think this is a great shame. We live in an age where politics is increasingly marginalised and where we are actively seeking new ways of engagement yet we exclude a large number of people from participation who would have a strong contribution to make. </p>
<p>As for the use of social media my own experience has been that it can at times be difficult. I&#8217;ve had some great exchanges on Twitter during #bbcqt and with @cllrtim and others, but on more than one occasion I&#8217;ve had to delete a part written tweet and sit on my hands to avoid &#8216;crossing the line&#8217;. </p>
<p>As more people begin to use social media I suspect we will see this challenged. There will inevitably continue to be headlines about officials being dismissed because of &#8216;that evil Face Book and Twitter&#8217; &#8211; the Daily Mail &amp; Express seem to love this stuff &#8211; but as the social tech fulcrum moves and we develop a maturity towards and understanding of these issues, the mist of uncertainty will lift and common sense will prevail. </p>
<p>We may even see the rules on standing for office scrapped and then who knows what the future will hold for many of us!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Popham</title>
		<link>http://campbellwright.co.uk/wesenwille/2010/01/socially-resticted-by-way-of-remuneration/comment-page-1/#comment-1024</link>
		<dc:creator>John Popham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 09:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://campbellwright.co.uk/wesenwille/?p=162#comment-1024</guid>
		<description>As someone who both worked in local government and was politically active, at the time the restrictions were introduced, I know that the restrictions apply to holding office in a political party and standing for election. The leader of a neighbouring council was employed by the council I worked for at the time of the introduction of restrictions, and he was allowed to move to a more junior post on (I think) a protected salary. I think that was pretty much against the spirit of the restrictions (not that I necessarily agree they are a good thing)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who both worked in local government and was politically active, at the time the restrictions were introduced, I know that the restrictions apply to holding office in a political party and standing for election. The leader of a neighbouring council was employed by the council I worked for at the time of the introduction of restrictions, and he was allowed to move to a more junior post on (I think) a protected salary. I think that was pretty much against the spirit of the restrictions (not that I necessarily agree they are a good thing)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

